Promotion of cell proliferation by clusterin in the renal tissue repair phase after ischemia-reperfusion injury
Abstract
Renal repair begins soon after the kidney suffers ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI); however, its molecular pathways are not fully understood. Clusterin (Clu) is a chaperone protein with cytoprotective functions in renal IRI. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Clu in renal repair after IRI. IRI was induced in the left kidneys of wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J (B6) vs. Clu knockout (KO) B6 mice by clamping the renal pedicles for 28–45 min at the body temperature of 32°C. The renal repair was assessed by histology and confirmed by renal function. Gene expression was examined using PCR array. Here, we show that following IRI, renal tubular damage and Clu expression in WT kidneys were induced at day 1, reached the maximum at day 3, and significantly diminished at day 7 along with normal function, whereas the tubular damage in Clu KO kidneys steadily increased from initiation of insult to the end of the experiment, when renal failure occurred. Renal repair in WT kidneys was positively correlated with an increase in Ki67+ proliferative tubular cells and survival from IRI. The functions of Clu in renal repair and renal tubular cell proliferation in cultures were associated with upregulation of a panel of genes that could positively regulate cell cycle progression and DNA damage repair, which might promote cell proliferation but not involve cell migration. In conclusion, these data suggest that Clu is required for renal tissue regeneration in the kidney repair phase after IRI, which is associated with promotion of tubular cell proliferation.
acute kidney injury (aki) is a common health problem that affects ∼7–20% of hospitalized patients (35, 51) and can be caused by a variety of insults, including renal ischemia, inflammatory or infectious insults, and cytotoxic reagent or nephrotoxic drug exposure (29, 31, 51). Typically, the kidney demonstrates a remarkable capacity to repair damage after AKI (4); however, patients with AKI have a higher risk for developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) that further leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality, compared with those AKI-free patients (7, 54). The pathways by which AKI induces CKD and/or ESRD are poorly understood, but evidence in the literature suggests that it may be associated with the incomplete regeneration or repair of kidney tissues after AKI (5, 17, 31, 49). Therefore, completely understanding renal repair or regeneration becomes critical for preventing kidney disease after AKI in patients.
Clusterin (Clu) is a glycoprotein, encoded by a single gene in both the human and mouse genomes (22). After its translation, the presecreted or cytoplasmic form (cClu) is glycosylated in the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi body and is further cleaved at an internal bond between Arg-205 and Ser-206 to produce a mature protein, a heterodimer of α- and β- chains that is secreted (sClu) (10, 24). Clu not only is a major glycoprotein in physiological fluids, such as plasma, milk, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and semen (22), but its expression is also upregulated in renal tissues following a variety of insults, including unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) (52, 56), transplant rejection, and intrinsic renal disease (12). Further studies indicate that Clu is an apically secreted glycoprotein in renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) (18) and is detected in both viable and apoptotic cells following renal injury (16, 52). The renal cytoprotective function of Clu has been demonstrated in several animal studies. In a model of antibody-mediated glomerular injury, kidneys perfused with Clu-depleted plasma develop significantly greater proteinuria at all time points vs. control kidneys infused with normal plasma (41). In addition, a deficiency in Clu expression worsens renal IRI (56) and in aging mice causes a progressive glomerulopathy (40). However, the mechanisms by which Clu protects the kidney from injury, or maintains renal tissue homeostasis, are not fully understood. In the present study, the role of Clu in renal tissue repair after IRI was investigated in wild-type (WT) mice compared with Clu knockout (KO) mice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and cell cultures.
Both WT C57BL/6 (B6) and Clu KO mice in a B6 background (B6-Clu−/−) were received from the breeding colonies in the animal facility at the Jack Bell Research Centre (Vancouver, BC). All the animals (males, 10–12 wk old) for the experiments were cared for in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines under the protocols approved by the Animal Use Subcommittee at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, BC).
Clu null TECs were isolated from the kidney cortex of Clu KO mice as described previously (56) and were immortalized or cloned by transfection with origin-deficient SV40 DNA. The phenotype of cloned murine TECs was confirmed by their expression of E-cadherin and CD13 (alanine aminopeptidase) using fluorescence-activating cell sorting (FACS) analysis and were grown in complete K1 (K1+/+) medium as described previously (11).
Ectopic expression of Clu in cultured TECs.
Clu null TECs were converted to Clu-expressing TECs (TEC-CluhClu) by stable expression of human Clu isoform 1 cDNA using pHEX6300 vector, as described previously (27), whereas Clu null TECs with stable expression of empty pHEX6300 vector were used as Clu-negative control cells (TEC-Clu−/−). Both cell types were grown and maintained in complete K1 medium in the presence of the selective antibiotic zeocin (up to 500 μg/ml) and were further selected by flow cytometric cell sorting based on the expression of pHEX6300-encoded green fluorescent protein (GFP). More than 95% of cells in both TEC-CluhClu and TEC-Clu−/− cultures were confirmed to have a high level of GFP by either flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy.
Renal IRI.
Renal IRI was induced in the left kidney of WT vs. Clu KO mice. In brief, mice were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), and isoflurane as needed. The left kidneys were exposed through a flank incision, followed by the induction of ischemia in these kidneys through clamping renal pedicles at the body temperature of 32°C for either 28 min (renal repair) or for 38 min (mouse survival). After the clamps were released, reperfusion of the kidneys was confirmed visually. In the examination of renal repair/regeneration in these left kidneys after reperfusion, the nonischemic right kidneys in the same mice were kept for life support. In the examination of renal function or mouse survival after IRI, the right kidneys were removed (unilateral nephrectomy).
Western blotting.
Clu protein in protein extracts of TECs and renal tissues was examined by Western blotting as described previously (56). Briefly, protein extract samples (100–150 μg/sample) were fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE, then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The levels of Clu protein were identified with goat polyclonal anti-Clu-α antibodies (1:1,000 dilution; C-18, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence assay (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK). The β-actin as a protein content determinant in each sample was reprobed using anti–actin IgG on the same blot (Sigma-Aldrich Canada, Oakville, ON). To quantitate the Clu expression in Western blot analysis, the density of Clu (sClu) and reprobed β-actin bands was measured by densitometry. In each blot, the relative level of sClu in each sample was calculated by normalization with its density of β-actin.
Immunohistochemical analysis.
The kidneys harvested from mice were perfused with PBS before formalin fixation, paraffin embedding, and sectioning. The expression of Clu or Ki67 protein in kidney sections was assessed by a standard immunohistochemical method. Briefly, after deparaffin and rehydration buffered-formalin-fixed sections were treated with 3% H2O2 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.4) for 30 min at room temperature (RT) to quench endogenous peroxidase, followed by permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min at RT. After being washed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and blocked with 2% normal serum, the sections were incubated with 1:50 dilution of primary goat polyclonal anti-Clu-α antibody (C-18, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or rabbit polyclonal anti-Ki67 antibodies (AB9280, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) overnight at 4°C. The immune complexes of Clu and anti-Clu antibody or of Ki67 and anti-Ki67 antibody on the tissue section were detected using anti-goat or anti-rabbit Ig antibody conjugated with biotin, the secondary antibody, and were visualized using a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Labs, Burlington, ON). The control negative staining included the sections incubated with normal goat or rabbit IgG instead of anti-Clu or anti-Ki67 antibody as the primary antibody.
To quantitate the expression of Clu or Ki67 in the kidney in the immunohistochemical analysis, the number of Clu-expressing tubules or Ki67-expressing cells was counted in each view, which was randomly selected in the region of renal cortex under ×400 magnification (high-power field; hpf). The Clu-expressing tubules or Ki67-positive cells in each kidney were quantitated by averaging at least 20 nonoverlapping fields in two serial sections.
Determination of renal function and semiquantitative assessment of renal injury.
The function of the kidneys was determined using the levels of SCr or BUN. SCr was measured by using the CREA method on the Dimension Vista System with a Flex reagent cartridge in the Chemistry Laboratory at Vancouver Coastal Health Regional Laboratory Medicine (Vancouver, BC), and BUN measurement was performed using a QuantiChrom urea assay kit (BioAssay Systems).
Histological assessment of tubular injury in kidney sections was performed in a blinded fashion. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections (5-μm thickness, longitudinal) were stained by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) methods. The percentage of damaged tubules (combined necrosis and vacuolization) in the total tubules was counted in each view, randomly selected in the region of renal cortex under ×400 magnification, and averaged at least of 20 nonoverlapping fields for each kidney.
PCR array.
The expression of 84 cell cycle-associated genes in the kidneys or cultured TECs was quantitatively examined using PCR Array kits following the manufacturer's instructions (SABiosciences-Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The kidney samples were prepared as follows: after perfusion with saline, one part of renal tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for RNA extraction. The RNA in TECs was directly extracted from the monolayer after the removal of culture medium. In each group (Clu-expressing vs. Clu null), four different samples (renal tissue samples from 4 different animals, or TEC cultures grown at 4 different times) were randomly selected for the determination of the gene expression profile using PCR arrays. The total RNA from these samples was extracted and purified using an RNeasy Microarray Tissue Mini kit (Qiagen), and converted to cDNA using an RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen). The expression of selected genes was amplified by real-time PCR using RT2 Profile PCR arrays (Qiagen). Data were analyzed using Web-based PCR Array Data Analysis Software (www.SABiosciences.com/pcrarraydataanalysis.php).
Cell proliferation by methylthiazol tetrazolium assay.
Methylthiazol tetrazolium (MTT) assay was used to measure cell proliferation or viable cell number in cultures. Cells were seeded at 2,500/well in 96-well microplates, and each condition was tested at least in quadruplicate. In brief, 10 μl of 0.5 mg/ml of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich Canada) were added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The formazan crystals in viable cells were then dissolved in 100 μl/well of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich Canada). The OD of the color in each well as a proliferation index was quantified at 562-nm wavelength using an ELx808 Ultra Microplate Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). The growth rate was calculated as follows: growth rate (OD/day) = (ODend − ODbegin)/time (day), where time represented the period of examination, ODend represented the absorbance unit at the end of the examination, and ODbegin represented the absorbance unit at the beginning of the examination.
Cell cycle distribution analysis.
TECs (1 × 106 cells/well) were seeded in six-well plates in complete K1 medium for 24 h and arrested and synchronized cell growth in serum growth factor-free K1 medium overnight. The cells were incubated in complete K1 medium for 24 h, followed by harvesting by a brief trypsinization and centrifugation, and finally washed twice with ice-cold PBS. The staining with propidium iodide (PI; Invitrogen Canada) was performed as follows: cells were fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol overnight, followed by treatment with 80 μg/ml of DNase-free RNase and staining with 40 μg/ml of PI at 37°C for 30 min. The DNA content was measured using flow cytometry or FACS and then analyzed with flowJo analysis software (Tree Star, Ashland OR).
Cell migration in a wound-healing assay.
The migration of TECs (TEC-CluhClu vs. TEC-Clu−/−) was compared in monolayer cell cultures. Briefly, cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were seeded in six-well plates. After overnight incubation, a wound in a cell monolayer was created by scratching with a pipette tip, followed by a gentle rinse twice with warm PBS to remove the detached cells. Cell migration at the wound edge to the wound space was captured using a Zeiss 200M Axiovert inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Gottingen, Germany), and the migration distance from 0 to 6 h was calculated using Axiovison Rel 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy).
Statistical analysis.
Two-way ANOVA or t-tests (2-tailed distribution) were used as appropriate for comparisons between groups. Data were collected from individual experiments or mice in each study for statistical analysis. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Clu expression is required for renal regeneration after renal IRI.
The kidney is able to repair itself after AKI by both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms (13), which have not yet been fully understood. To examine the impact of Clu expression on renal repair after AKI, renal function and tissue regeneration after IRI in Clu-expressing WT vs. Clu KO mice were examined.
The kinetics of both renal repair and Clu protein expression were first examined during the recovery phase of IRI. As shown in Fig. 1A, the expression of Clu protein in renal cortical tissue extracts from WT mice was upregulated following renal IRI in a time-dependent manner, reaching the highest level at day 3 postreperfusion, but declining to almost the basal levels at day 7. By immunohistochemical analysis, the expression of Clu protein was localized mainly in the renal tubules (Fig. 1B), while an absence of Clu protein was detected in both extracts and sections of the kidneys from Clu KO mice. To reveal the correlation between renal Clu expression and tissue repair, the levels of tissue damage in the cortex of between these WT and Clu KO kidneys were semiquantitatively compared by histological analysis with PAS staining. As shown in Fig. 2, the basal level of damaged tubules (tubules/hpf) of WT at day 0 (1.26 ± 0.55) was not significantly different from that in KO controls (0.94 ± 0.27), and following IRI, it was increased to 7.77 ± 3.76 at day 1 in WT kidneys, and 13.62 ± 7.33, a maximum level, at day 3, followed by the presence of less tubular damage (4.13 ± 2.45) and tissue repair at day 7. However, in Clu KO kidneys, the tubular damage was more severe than in WT mice (P < 0.0001, WT vs. KO, 2-way ANOVA), and was not repaired at all by day 7, which was indicated by a progressive increase in tubular damage from 8.58 ± 1.12 at day 1 to 22.14 ± 1.7 at day 7. Taken together, these data suggest that IRI-induced Clu expression positively correlates with the levels of tubular damage in WT kidneys, and the lack of Clu expression in Clu KO kidneys impairs the renal repair or regeneration after IRI.

Fig. 1.Upregulation of clusterin (Clu) expression in renal tubules following ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Renal IRI in left kidneys of wild-type (WT) compared with Clu knockout (KO) mice was induced by clamping renal pedicles for 28 min at the body temperature of 32°C, and renal tissues were harvested at different time points (0, 1, 3, and 7 days, three mice per group at each time point) after reperfusion. (A) Western blot analysis of Clu protein in total protein extracts of renal cortical tissues; (B) Clu protein in tissue sections was localized by a standard immunohistochemical stain and versioned under a microscope (× 200 magnification). Brown color: positive stain of Clu protein. The stain was negative in kidney sections of Clu KO mice (data not shown). Data are a representative of three separate determinants.

Fig. 2.A deficiency in Clu expression disrupts the progress of renal regeneration or repair after IRI. The sections of the left kidneys of WT compared with Clu KO mice, harvested at different time points (0, 1, 3 and 7 days after reperfusion) as described in Fig. 1, were stained PAS, and the damaged tubules in the cortex were counted under the microscope. (A) A typical image of the cortex in PAS-stained kidney sections from WT vs. KO group at different time points. The black stars (∗) indicated the damaged tubules (necrotic tubules, tubular dilation, intratubular cast formation and tubular vacuolation). (B) The percentage of damaged tubules in total tubules of the cortex per view under × 400 magnification was counted in a blinded fashion. At least 20 views were counted in the cortex and averaged for each kidney/mouse. Data are presented as mean ± standard derivation (SD) of each group (n = 3). P < 0.0001 (WT vs. KO, two-way ANOVA).
Renal repair deficiency in clu KO mice is associated with renal failure and mortality.
To further confirm renal repair deficiency after IRI in Clu KO mice as shown in Fig. 2, both renal function after 28 min of ischemia and mouse survival after 38 min of ischemia were examined in uninephrectomized Clu KO mice compared with WT mice. As shown in Fig. 3, in the KO group seven of nine Clu KO mice exhibited obvious renal failure, indicated by >100 mg/dl BUN and equal to or >0.94 mg/dl SCr (6 of them: over 1 mg/dl SCr: severe renal failure), and one had mild renal failure (BUN: 101.7 mg/dl; SCr: 0.39 mg/dl). In the WT group, renal insufficiency was seen in only two of nine mice; both BUN (108.74 mg/dl) and SCr (0.63 mg/dl) in one mouse were similar to those in Clu KO mice with renal failure, and the other just had a mild degree of renal dysfunction (BUN: 101.48 mg/dl; SCr: 0.34 mg/dl). The statistical analysis indicated that the levels of both BUN and SCr in Clu KO mice were significantly higher than those in WT mice (BUN: P = 0.0241; SCr: P = 0.0008, n = 9). When the ischemia was prolonged to 38 min in this model as shown in Fig. 4, 7 of 10 Clu mice died in a period of 3 days after IRI, while only one died in the WT group (P = 0.0048, log-rank test, n = 10). Taken together, renal failure and mortality of Clu KO mice reflect the poor renal regeneration or repair after IRI in these mice.

Fig. 3.Renal tissue repair deficiency in Clu KO mice after IRI is associated with renal failure. Renal IRI in left kidneys of WT compared with Clu KO mice was induced by clamping renal pedicles for 28 min at the body temperature of 32°C, followed by right kidney removal (unilateral nephrectomy). Sera were collected at day 7 after IRI. Kidney function was determined by measurement of serum creatinine (SCr) and urea (BUN). The horizontal line indicated the mean level for each group. (A) BUN level in each mouse. P = 0.0241 (WT vs. KO, t-test, n = 9). (B) Scr level in each mouse. P = 0.0008 (WT vs. KO, t-test, n = 9).

Fig. 4.Renal tissue repair deficiency in Clu KO mice after IRI is associated with an increase in mortality. Renal IRI in left kidneys of WT compared with Clu KO mice was induced by clamping renal pedicles for 38 min at the body temperature of 32°C, followed by right kidney removal (unilateral nephrectomy). Animal survival was closely monitored for 7 days after IRI. Data are presented as percentage of survival in each group. P = 0.0048 [WT vs. KO, log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, n = 10).
Clu-mediated renal repair is associated with cell proliferation in tubules.
To reveal the mechanisms and pathways by which Clu mediates renal repair during recovery from IRI, proliferating cells specifically labeled by the expression of nuclear protein Ki67 (42) were directly counted in the sections of WT vs. Clu KO kidneys under the microscope. As shown in Fig. 5, the numbers of Ki67-expressing tubular cells in the WT group were changed in parallel with degree of tubular damage (Fig. 2); the number of proliferating cells increased from 10.65 ± 3.81 at day 0 to 32.1 ± 11.66 at day 3, followed by a decrease to 21.57 ± 9.26 at day 7, whereas in Clu KO kidneys, the numbers of Ki67-positive cells did not significantly change following reperfusion (9.63 ± 3.42 at day 0 to 14.63 ± 3.88 at day 3 and 14.6 ± 2.92 at day 7) and were statistically lower than those in WT kidneys (P < 0.0001, WT vs. KO, 2-way ANOVA). These data suggest that tubular damage stimulates the cell proliferation in Clu-expressing kidneys, but not in Clu null kidneys, or the lack of Clu expression disrupts cell proliferation in kidney tubules.

Fig. 5.Clu expression is associated with an increase in proliferative tubular cells after IRI. Renal tissues were collected at day 0, 1, 3 and 7 postreperfusion as described in Fig. 1. The proliferative cells in the kidney sections were identified by immunohistochemical staining of nuclear protein Ki67. (A) A typical image of Ki67-stained kidney sections from WT vs. KO group at day 3 after reperfusion. The red arrows indicated positive stain of Ki67 protein (brown). (B) The number of Ki67 positive tubular cells per view (under × 400 magnification, high-powered field-hpf) was counted in a blinded fashion. At least 20 views were counted and averaged for each kidney/mouse. Data are presented as mean ± SD of each group (n = 3). P < 0.0001 (WT vs. KO, two-way ANOVA). The control stain with normal rabbit IgG was negative in kidney sections (data not shown).
To further examine how Clu influences cell proliferation in the kidneys after IRI, the expression of 84 genes identified as positively or negatively regulating the cell cycle, the transitions between the phases, DNA replication, checkpoints, and arrest was examined in the kidneys after 3 days of reperfusion using a Cell Cycle PCR array. As listed in Supplemental Table S1 (all supplemental material for this article is accessible on the journal Web site), the transcription of 16 genes (Shc1, Pmp22, Skp2, Cks1b, Ccnd1, CCnd2, Mki67, Ran, Aurka, Stag1, Tsg101, Gpr132, Msh2, Hus1, Tfdp1, and Slfn1) were statistically upregulated, whereas genes Notch2 and Gadd45a were downregulated in WT kidneys compared with Clu KO kidneys used as a negative control. Among these predominantly 18 Clu-associated genes, 15 are associated with the promotion of cell cycle progression, growth, and DNA repair, while 3 (Notch2, Pmp22, Slfn1) are associated with cell cycle arrest or apoptosis.
Ectopic expression of clu enhances renal tubular cell proliferation.
To further understand the functions of Clu in renal repair, the effect of ectopic expression of human Clu (hClu) on the proliferation or division and migration of TECs was examined. As shown in Fig. 6A, both cClu (presecreted or cytoplasmic form) and sClu (secreted form) were detected in Clu null TEC lines expressing the pHEX6300 vector containing full-length hClu isoform 2 cDNA, TEC-CluhClu, while in control cells the same Clu null TEC lines that were stably expressing empty pHEX6300 (TEC-Clu−/− cells), no Clu proteins were detected.

Fig. 6.Clusterin expression enhances TEC growth in vitro. (A) TEC-Clu−/− was an immortalized Clu null TEC line (derived from a male Clu KO mouse) and was stably expressing empty plasmid pHEX6300. TEC-Clu−hClu was TEC-Clu−/− line that was stably expressing pHEX6300 containing human Clu cDNA. The Clu expression in these two cell lines was determined by Western blot analysis. Clu protein was only detected in TEC-Clu−hClu cells. (B) The cell growth in TEC-Clu−hClu vs. TEC-Clu−/− line was determined by MTT assay following the time of incubation at 37°C in 5% of CO2 atmosphere. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four determinants in a representative of three experiments, P < 0.0001 (WT vs. KO, two-way ANOVA). (C) The increase of mean OD value or viable cell number (%) per day was calculated based on the growth curve of these two cell lines. Data are a representative of three separate experiments. P = 0.0474 (WT vs. KO, two-way ANOVA).
The proliferation of TEC-CluhClu vs. TEC-Clu−/− cells was first compared under the same normal culture conditions using an MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 6B, the absorbance (OD) values, reflecting viable cell numbers, in TEC-CluhClu cell cultures were significantly higher than those in TEC-Clu−/− cell cultures even during the equilibrium phase at day 3 (P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). Similar results were also seen when the increase in cell proliferation was calculated by the percentage following the timing of incubation until day 3 (P = 0.0474, 2-way ANOVA) (Fig. 6C). These data suggest that ectopic expression of Clu promotes cell proliferation or growth.
To further confirm this observation, cell cycle distribution in TEC-CluhClu vs. TEC-Clu−/− cells in response to the stimulation of growth factors and serum after overnight starvation was counted using flow cytometric analysis with a PI stain. As shown in Fig. 7 and Table 1, the cell cycle distribution of TEC-CluhClu cells was different from that of TEC-Clu−/− cells; during a period of 24 h-incubation with growth factors and serum, the number of TEC-CluhClu cells at the G2/M phase was significantly higher than that of TEC-Clu−/− cells, and there was a progressive shift of the cells from the G0/G1 to the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle following the time of incubation, which was not seen in TEC-Clu−/− cells. These data suggest that ectopic expression of Clu increases the number of G2/M-arrested TECs and normalizes the cell cycle progression for cell proliferation.

Fig. 7.Effect of ectopic expression of Clu on cell cycle distribution in cultured TECs. A monolayer (70–80% of confluent) of TEC-Clu−hClu vs. TEC-Clu−/− cells was grown in complete K1 medium (containing 5% bovine serum and growth factors) after overnight starvation in serum-growth factor free K1 medium. The percentage of cells in G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle in these cultured TECs was determined following the time of incubation with the complete K1 medium from 0 to 24 hrs. Data are presented as a typical graph for the cell cycle distribution in FACS analysis of each group.
| 0 h | 6 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEC-CluhCLU cells | |||
| G0/G1 | 66.8 ± 0.99% | 62.2 ± 4.95% | 50.9 ± 1.84% |
| S | 11.0 ± 0.14% | 14.65 ± 1.06% | 22.9 ± 0.14% |
| G2/M | 20.6 ± 0.57% | 21.9 ± 6.22% | 24.85 ± 1.49% |
| TEC-Clu−/− cells | |||
| G0/G1 | 57.45 ± 0.35% | 51.45 ± 0.35% | 60.25 ± 0.21% |
| S | 23.45 ± 0.78% | 27.5 ± 0.99% | 20.95 ± 0.92% |
| G2/M | 16.55 ± 1.06% | 18.05 ± 1.91% | 16.2 ± 0.14% |
Clu regulates cell cycle-related gene expression in TECs.
The effect of ectopic expression of Clu on cell cycle-related genes in TECs was examined using a PCR array. As listed in Supplemental Table S1, the expression of 52 genes was significantly affected by the presence of Clu; 50 genes were upregulated, while 2 genes (Pmp22 and Ccnd2) were downregulated. According to the functions of these genes, the effect of Clu on the cell cycle of cultured TECs was divided into three groups: 1) 29 upregulated genes (Notch2, Shc1, Bcl2, Skp2, Cdk1, Cdk4, Cdk6, Cks1b, Cdc6, Cdc25a, Cdc25c, Chek1, Ccna2, Ccnd3, Ccne1, Ccnf, Ccnb1, Ccnc, Mcm2, Mcm3, Mcm4, Ran, Aurka, Aurkb, Mad2l1, Stag1, Stmn1, Dst, and Tsg101) and downregulated Pmp22 promoted cell survival and cycle progression; 2) 10 upregulated genes (Gpr132, Mre11a, Msh2, Rad9, Rad17, Rad21, Atr, Brca1, Hus1, and Nbn) acted as cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA damage; and 3) 11 upregulated genes (Casp3, Cdk5rap1, Trp53, Ppm1d, Wee1, Chek2, E2f1, E2f2, E2f3, E2f4, and Tfdp1) and downregulated gene Ccnd2 were associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Compared with the expression profile of these genes in WT kidneys against Clu KO background controls after IRI (Supplemental Table S1), seven genes (Shc1, Skp2, Cks1b, Ran, Aurka, Stag1, and Tsg101) for cell cycle progression and survival and three genes (Gpr132, Msh2, and Hus1) for DNA repair were commonly upregulated in both in vitro and in vivo systems, while only one gene, Tfdp1 (for stimulation of E2F-dependent transcription), in the group for cell cycle arrest and apoptosis was found to be upregulated in both systems, suggesting that Clu may have a more profound effect on the signaling pathways mediating cell cycle progression and survival rather than cell cycle arrest.
Clu suppresses TEC migration in vitro.
The repair of the kidney after IRI involves both proliferation and differentiation of proximal TECs as well as cell migration (4, 36). To understand the mechanism by which Clu mediates renal repair after IRI, the role of Clu in TEC migration was investigated. As shown in Fig. 8, ectopic expression of Clu in TECs resulted in a decrease in cell migration in an in vitro model of wound healing, indicated by the fact that TEC-Clu−hClu cells migrated 105 ± 17.34 μm in 6 h compared with 138 ± 26.9 μm in TEC-Clu−/− cell cultures at the same time point (P = 0.0107), suggesting that restraining TEC migration by Clu may be required for the renal repair and regeneration after injury.

Fig. 8.Effect of Clu expression on TEC migration in vitro. The cell migration of TEC-Clu−hClu vs. TEC-Clu−/− cells was determined by wound healing assay. A cross-shaped wound in a confluent monolayer of TECs was created by scratching with a pipette tip, and was incubated in complete K1 medium. Cell migration at the wound edge to the wound space was captured using Zeiss 200M Axiovert inverted microscope after 6 hrs of incubation, and the migration distance was calculated using Axiovison Rel 4.8 software. (A) A representative image of wound healing/cell migration. (B) The distance of cell migration in each cell culture. Data are presented as mean ± SD of six measurements in three separate experiments (P = 0.0107, TEC-Clu−hCLU vs. TEC-Clu−/− cells, t-test, n = 6).
DISCUSSION
Clu has been previously characterized as a chaperone-like protein; it contains many amphiphilic helices, binds to other proteins to form soluble complexes (10, 53), and functions in both the extracellular and intracellular compartments of the cell (14, 38). Although it was discovered >30 years ago (20), and an immense volume of research has been dedicated to it since, the biological activities of this protein are still not fully understood. In the kidney, upregulation of Clu expression in renal tubules has been reported in a variety of different renal pathologies, such as IRI (56), UUO (21), aging nephropathy (25), and nephrotoxic drug administration (9, 47). Similarly, Clu has been reported to protect the kidney from aging-related glomerulopathy (40), IRI (56), and UUO-induced renal fibrosis (23) in murine models. This study demonstrates for the first time that the expression of Clu in renal tubules after IRI is needed for renal repair, regeneration, and renoprotection, which is associated with the promotion of tubular cell proliferation.
The kidney has a remarkable capacity to repair itself after injury, so an understanding of this process will potentially lead to the development of improved regenerative strategies addressing kidney injury (30). In Clu null kidneys, after IRI renal tissue repair or regeneration is not seen at the beginning of 7 days (Fig. 2), but occurs at day 14 (unpublished observations), while in WT controls, the repair starts at day 3 and reaches near completion at day 7 (Fig. 2). These data suggest that Clu may be required for renal repair. Similar results have been observed in the regeneration of the pancreas after partial pancreatectomy, indicated by the finding that in Clu KO mice pancreatectomy results in a poor formation of regenerating lobule, particularly regenerating β cells, while in WT mice the pancreatectomy is associated with a robust development of new lobules with ductules, acini, and endocrine islets (26). How Clu mediates tissue regeneration, such as in the kidney after IRI, has not yet been seriously investigated.
It has been documented previously in the literature that renal repair is associated with a cascade of dedifferentiation, proliferation, and migration of the surviving epithelial cells, which may also include mesenchymal stem cells to replace dead cells after injury (4, 13, 19, 36). During murine embryogenesis, Clu expression is widely found in developing epithelia, such as in the epithelial cells of comma- and S-shaped bodies of the primordial kidney (15) but may not be absolutely required for the differentiation and morphogenesis, as WT and Clu KO mice were not found to be phenotypically different in postnatal development (32). Interestingly, one study shows that a quantitative estimation of large motor neuron populations in the facial nucleus reveals a significant deficit in motor cells (∼16%) in Clu KO compared with that in WT mice (6), and Clu increases migration of cardiac progenitor cells by increasing CXCR4 expression (28). These studies may imply that the absence of Clu expression in Clu KO kidneys may lead to a decrease in the number and migration of renal stem/progenitor cells that have been found to contribute to renal repair after injury (34, 39, 48). However, ectopic expression of Clu in cultured TECs inhibits cell migration compared with that in mock-transfected cells (Fig. 8), suggesting that this in vitro experimental system may not be the same as seen in Clu-expressing WT kidneys compared with Clu null kidneys, and/or Clu may regulate cell migration differently in different cell types, as in the promotion of stem/progenitor cell migration as reported previously (28) but inhibition of differentiated epithelial cell migration as shown in Fig. 8.
During renal repair after injury, the upregulation of Clu expression is positively correlated with the levels of cell proliferation and tissue damage in the kidneys (Figs. 1, 2, and 5) but is not seen in the proliferating tubular cells. The immunohistochemical staining of Clu is mainly seen in the distal-like tubules (Fig. 1), whereas Ki67 expression is detected in the proximal tubules (Fig. 5). Similarly, Witzgall et al. (52) have reported that in the kidney after IRI, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is detected primarily in the S3 segment of the proximal tubule, while Clu is also expressed primarily in the S3 segment and as well in the distal tubules. However, none of these cells with upregulated Clu are positively stained with PCNA, suggesting that proliferating TECs in the S3 segment of the proximal tubules do not express an upregulated level of Clu in an immunohistochemical staining assay. An increase in cell proliferation in Clu-expressing WT kidneys is consistent with enhanced cell growth in cultured TECs with ectopic expression of Clu (Fig. 6). PCR array analysis indicates that compared with a Clu-negative background (Clu KO kidneys) Clu upregulates many cell cycle-related genes that are associated with renal regeneration in kidneys postinjury and cell proliferation in cultured TECs (Table 1). However, the mechanisms by which Clu mediates renal repair and regeneration after injury are still not fully understood. In the kidney, Clu expression is localized to both dedifferentiated and dying epithelial cells (16), suggesting that it may function in both surviving and dying epithelial cells. Indeed, evidence in the literature has shown that Clu has many cellular functions in different experimental systems; it mediates cell aggregation (3), cell survival or anti-apoptosis (50, 56), cell proliferation (37, 45, 46), proapoptosis by its nuclear isoform (nClu) (2), and clearance of cellular debris into nonprofessional phagocytes (1). Recently, it has been found to stimulate the expression of metalloproteinase-9 and tumor necrosis factor-α and chemotactic migration of macrophages (43, 44). Renal repair is a complex process of many cellular and molecular interactions; after injury, some renal tubular cells die by apoptosis and necrosis, followed by the repair or regeneration of the damaged tubules by repopulation of remaining survival TECs through dedifferentiation and proliferation (4, 19), while at the same time infiltrating macrophages are also required for the process of renal repair (55). How the different functions of Clu combine to facilitate renal repair processes is not clear, but it can be rationally hypothesized that following tissue injury the upregulated Clu in dying cells may promote the clearance of cellular debris into both nonprofessional and professional (macrophage) phagocytes; colony stimulating factor-1, secreted from activated macrophages or others, stimulates the proliferation of dedifferentiated TECs (33), while Clu in dedifferentiated TECs enhances cell survival in the inflammatory microenvironment and cell proliferation and differentiation by upregulating expression of many cell cycle-related genes. Indeed, Clu has been reported to enhance neuronal survival and differentiation from human neural precursor cells in cultures (8), and the proliferation of corneal epithelial cells by the induction of hepatocyte growth factor (37) and of astrocytes by epidermal growth factor (45).
In conclusion, Clu is a multifunctional protein constitutively expressing in the kidney, and its expression is induced in many types of renal pathologies, including AKI. Using Clu KO vs. WT mice, it has been demonstrated that Clu expression increases the resistance of the kidney to IRI (56), aging-related glomerulopathy (40), and renal fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy (23), and the present study further extends these findings in demonstrating a role for Clu in renal repair after IRI. The mechanisms by which Clu exerts its effects require further investigation; however, benefits of these insights may translate into wide-ranging therapies for the prevention or accelerated repair of renal units post-acute injury or kidney disease.
GRANTS
This study was supported by the grants from the
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Author contributions: C.Y.N., M.E.G., and C.D. provided conception and design of research; C.Y.N., M.E.G., and C.D. interpreted results of experiments; C.Y.N., M.E.G., and C.D. edited and revised manuscript; C.Y.N., Q.G., M.E.G., and C.D. approved final version of manuscript; Q.G. performed experiments; Q.G. and C.D. analyzed data; Q.G. and C.D. prepared figures; C.D. drafted manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1. . Multiple receptors mediate apoJ-dependent clearance of cellular debris into nonprofessional phagocytes. Exp Cell Res 271: 130–141, 2001.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 2. . Chapter 5: nuclear CLU (nCLU) and the fate of the cell. Adv Cancer Res 104: 59–88, 2009.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 3. . Purification and characterization of a cell-aggregating factor (clusterin), the major glycoprotein in ram rete testis fluid. J Biol Chem 258: 7714–7720, 1983.
PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 4. . Cellular pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest 121: 4210–4221, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 5. . Increased risk of death and de novo chronic kidney disease following reversible acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 81: 477–485, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 6. . Clusterin expression during fetal and postnatal CNS development in mouse. Neuroscience 155: 714–724, 2008.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 7. . Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int 81: 442–448, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 8. . Clusterin secreted by astrocytes enhances neuronal differentiation from human neural precursor cells. Cell Death Differ 18: 907–913, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 9. . Induction of clusterin in tubules of nephrotic rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 33–37, 1998.
PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 10. . Apolipoprotein J: structure and tissue distribution. Biochemistry 29: 5380–5389, 1990.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 11. . Nitric oxide induces apoptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells through activation of caspase-8. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F1044–F1054, 2006.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 12. . Expression of clusterin in human renal diseases. Kidney Int 45: 828–835, 1994.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 13. . Ischemic kidney injury and mechanisms of tissue repair. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 3: 606–618, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 14. . Chapter 8: clusterin: a multifacet protein at the crossroad of inflammation and autoimmunity. Adv Cancer Res 104: 139–170, 2009.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 15. . Murine clusterin: molecular cloning and mRNA localization of a gene associated with epithelial differentiation processes during embryogenesis. J Cell Biol 122: 1119–1130, 1993.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 16. . Clusterin expression and apoptosis in tissue remodeling associated with renal regeneration. Kidney Int 47: 411–420, 1995.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 17. . Acute kidney injury in children and its potential consequences in adulthood. Blood Purif 33: 131–137, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 18. . Glycolipid-independent sorting of a secretory glycoprotein to the apical surface of polarized epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 271: 15854–15857, 1996.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 19. . Cellular maintenance and repair of the kidney. Annu Rev Physiol 72: 357–376, 2010.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 20. . The isolation and partial characterization of a sulphated glycoprotein from human whole saliva which aggregates strains of Streptococcus sanguis but not Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 24: 791–797, 1979.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 21. . Molecular pathological evaluation of clusterin in a rat model of unilateral ureteral obstruction as a possible biomarker of nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Pathol 35: 376–382, 2007.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 22. . Clusterin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34: 427–431, 2002.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 23. . Clusterin attenuates the development of renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 73–85, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 24. . Identification and characterization of glycosylation sites in human serum clusterin. Protein Sci 6: 2120–2133, 1997.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 25. . The age-related increase in renal clusterin mRNA is accelerated in obese Zucker rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 38–45, 1998.
PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 26. . Essential role of clusterin in pancreas regeneration. Dev Dyn 240: 605–615, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 27. . Reduction of cold ischemia-reperfusion injury by graft-expressing clusterin in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 30: 819–826, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 28. . Clusterin induces CXCR4 expression and migration of cardiac progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res 316: 3435–3442, 2010.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 29. . Drugs and AKI. Minerva Urol Nefrol 64: 51–62, 2012.
PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 30. . Regrow or repair: potential regenerative therapies for the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2390–2401, 2006.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 31. . Persistent renal damage after contrast-induced acute kidney injury: incidence, evolution, risk factors, and prognosis. Circulation 125: 3099–3107, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 32. . Apolipoprotein J/clusterin limits the severity of murine autoimmune myocarditis. J Clin Invest 106: 1105–1113, 2000.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 33. . CSF-1 signals directly to renal tubular epithelial cells to mediate repair in mice. J Clin Invest 119: 2330–2342, 2009.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 34. . Mesenchymal stem cells and kidney repair. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28: 788–793, 2013.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 35. . Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 39: 930–936, 2002.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 36. . Mechanisms of renal cell repair and regeneration after acute renal failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304: 905–912, 2003.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 37. . Clusterin promotes corneal epithelial cell growth through upregulation of hepatocyte growth factor by mesenchymal cells in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 2905–2910, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 38. . CLU “in and out”: looking for a link. Adv Cancer Res 105: 93–113, 2009.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 39. . Renal progenitors: an evolutionary conserved strategy for kidney regeneration. Nat Rev Nephrol 9: 137–146, 2013.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 40. . Apolipoprotein J/clusterin prevents a progressive glomerulopathy of aging. Mol Cell Biol 22: 1893–1902, 2002.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 41. . Clusterin depletion enhances immune glomerular injury in the isolated perfused kidney. Kidney Int 45: 817–827, 1994.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 42. . The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol 182: 311–322, 2000.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 43. . Clusterin induces the secretion of TNF-alpha and the chemotactic migration of macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 422: 200–205, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 44. . Clusterin induces matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression via ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB pathways in monocytes/macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 90: 761–769, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 45. . Epidermal growth factor receptor is involved in clusterin-induced astrocyte proliferation. Neuroreport 20: 435–439, 2009.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 46. . Clusterin enhances proliferation of primary astrocytes through extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Neuroreport 17: 1871–1875, 2006.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 47. . Temporal induction of clusterin in cisplatin nephrotoxicity. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 302–305, 1997.
PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 48. . Proximal tubular cells contain a phenotypically distinct, scattered cell population involved in tubular regeneration. J Pathol 229: 645–659, 2013.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 49. . Risk of chronic dialysis and death following acute kidney injury. Am J Med 125: 585–593, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 50. . Clusterin protects hepatocellular carcinoma cells from endoplasmic reticulum stress induced apoptosis through GRP78. PLoS One 8: e55981, 2013.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 51. . Acute kidney injury and mortality in hospitalized patients. Am J Nephrol 35: 349–355, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 52. . Localization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, vimentin, c-Fos, and clusterin in the postischemic kidney. Evidence for a heterogenous genetic response among nephron segments, and a large pool of mitotically active and dedifferentiated cells. J Clin Invest 93: 2175–2188, 1994.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 53. . Clusterin facilitates in vivo clearance of extracellular misfolded proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 3919–3931, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 54. . Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease: maladaptive repair. Contrib Nephrol 174: 149–155, 2011.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 55. . CSF-1 signaling mediates recovery from acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest 122: 4519–4532, 2012.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 56. . Loss of clusterin expression worsens renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298: F568–F578, 2010.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar

