Research ArticleSensory Processing

Temporal tuning of repetition suppression across the visual cortex

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00582.2019

The visual system adapts to its recent history. A phenomenon related to this is repetition suppression (RS), a reduction in neural responses to repeated compared with nonrepeated visual input. An intriguing hypothesis is that the timescale over which RS occurs across the visual hierarchy is tuned to the temporal statistics of visual input features, which change rapidly in low-level areas but are more stable in higher level areas. Here, we tested this hypothesis by studying the influence of the temporal lag between successive visual stimuli on RS throughout the visual system using functional (f)MRI. Twelve human volunteers engaged in four fMRI sessions in which we characterized the blood oxygen level-dependent response to pairs of repeated and nonrepeated natural images with interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 50 to 1,000 ms to quantify the temporal tuning of RS along the posterior-anterior axis of the visual system. As expected, RS was maximal for short ISIs and decayed with increasing ISI. Crucially, however, and against our hypothesis, RS decayed at a similar rate in early and late visual areas. This finding challenges the prevailing view that the timescale of RS increases along the posterior-anterior axis of the visual system and suggests that RS is not tuned to temporal input regularities.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY Visual areas show reduced neural responses to repeated compared with nonrepeated visual input, a phenomenon termed repetition suppression (RS). Here we show that RS decays at a similar rate in low- and high-level visual areas, suggesting that the short-term decay of RS across the visual hierarchy is not tuned to temporal input regularities. This may limit the specificity with which the mechanisms underlying RS could optimize the processing of input features across the visual hierarchy.

REFERENCES

  • Alink A, Abdulrahman H, Henson RN. Forward models demonstrate that repetition suppression is best modelled by local neural scaling. Nat Commun 9: 3854, 2018. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05957-0.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Amano K, Wandell BA, Dumoulin SO. Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. J Neurophysiol 102: 2704–2718, 2009. doi:10.1152/jn.00102.2009.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Arthurs OJ, Williams EJ, Carpenter TA, Pickard JD, Boniface SJ. Linear coupling between functional magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potential amplitude in human somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience 101: 803–806, 2000. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00511-X.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Barron HC, Garvert MM, Behrens TEJ. Repetition suppression: a means to index neural representations using BOLD? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371: 20150355, 2016. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0355.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 16: 4207–4221, 1996. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04207.1996.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Boynton GM, Finney EM. Orientation-specific adaptation in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 23: 8781–8787, 2003. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-25-08781.2003.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433–436, 1997. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Brunet NM, Fries P. Human visual cortical gamma reflects natural image structure. Neuroimage 200: 635–643, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.051.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Jansma JM, Fukunaga M, Bianciardi M, Duyn JH. Hemodynamic nonlinearities affect BOLD fMRI response timing and amplitude. Neuroimage 47: 1649–1658, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.001.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Dong DW, Atick JJ. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network 6: 345–358, 1995. doi:10.1088/0954-898X_6_3_003.
    CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar
  • Dragoi V, Sharma J, Sur M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 28: 287–298, 2000. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00103-3.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Engel SA, Rumelhart DE, Wandell BA, Lee AT, Glover GH, Chichilnisky EJ, Shadlen MN. fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 369: 525, 1994. doi:10.1038/369525a0.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein R, Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392: 598–601, 1998. doi:10.1038/33402.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Fang F, Murray SO, Kersten D, He S. Orientation-tuned FMRI adaptation in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 94: 4188–4195, 2005. doi:10.1152/jn.00378.2005.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1: 1–47, 1991. doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Gotts SJ, Chow CC, Martin A. Repetition priming and repetition suppression: A case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization. Cogn Neurosci 3: 227–237, 2012. doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.670617.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 14–23, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res 41: 1409–1422, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00073-6.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 24: 187–203, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80832-6.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Güçlü U, van Gerven MA. Deep neural networks reveal a gradient in the complexity of neural representations across the ventral stream. J Neurosci 35: 10005–10014, 2015. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5023-14.2015.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Hasson U, Yang E, Vallines I, Heeger DJ, Rubin N. A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. J Neurosci 28: 2539–2550, 2008. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5487-07.2008.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Henson R, Shallice T, Dolan R. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287: 1269–1272, 2000. doi:10.1126/science.287.5456.1269.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Henson RN. Repetition suppression to faces in the fusiform face area: a personal and dynamic journey. Cortex 80: 174–184, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.012.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Henson RN, Mouchlianitis E. Effect of spatial attention on stimulus-specific haemodynamic repetition effects. Neuroimage 35: 1317–1329, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.019.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Henson RN, Rylands A, Ross E, Vuilleumeir P, Rugg MD. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage 21: 1674–1689, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.020.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Henson RN, Shallice T, Gorno-Tempini ML, Dolan RJ. Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. Cereb Cortex 12: 178–186, 2002. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.2.178.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Hermes D, Miller KJ, Wandell BA, Winawer J. Stimulus dependence of gamma oscillations in human visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 25: 2951–2959, 2015. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu091.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Hermes D, Petridou N, Kay K, Winawer J. An image-computable model for the stimulus selectivity of gamma oscillations. eLife 8: e47035: 2019. doi:10.7554/eLife.47035.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Honey CJ, Thesen T, Donner TH, Silbert LJ, Carlson CE, Devinsky O, Doyle WK, Rubin N, Heeger DJ, Hasson U. Slow cortical dynamics and the accumulation of information over long timescales. Neuron 76: 423–434, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.011.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J Physiol 148: 574–591, 1959. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Huettel SA, McCarthy G. Regional differences in the refractory period of the hemodynamic response: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 14: 967–976, 2001. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0900.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17: 4302–4311, 1997. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kanwisher N, Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361: 2109–2128, 2006. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1934.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kay KN, Winawer J, Mezer A, Wandell BA. Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 110: 481–494, 2013a. doi:10.1152/jn.00105.2013.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kay KN, Winawer J, Rokem A, Mezer A, Wandell BA. A two-stage cascade model of bold responses in human visual cortex. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003079, 2013B. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003079.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kayser C, Salazar RF, König P. Responses to natural scenes in cat V1. J Neurophysiol 90: 1910–1920, 2003. doi:10.1152/jn.00195.2003.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn A, Movshon JA. Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 39: 681–691, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00438-0.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn A, Movshon JA. Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nat Neurosci 7: 764–772, 2004. doi:10.1038/nn1267.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kourtzi Z, Huberle E. Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation. Neuroimage 28: 440–452, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.017.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293: 1506–1509, 2001. doi:10.1126/science.1061133.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Kourtzi Z, Tolias AS, Altmann CF, Augath M, Logothetis NK. Integration of local features into global shapes: monkey and human fMRI studies. J Vis 3: 191–191, 2010. doi:10.1167/3.9.191.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács G, Kaiser D, Kaliukhovich DA, Vidnyánszky Z, Vogels R. Repetition probability does not affect fMRI repetition suppression for objects. J Neurosci 33: 9805–9812, 2013. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3423-12.2013.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Krekelberg B, van Wezel RJA, Albright TD. Adaptation in macaque MT reduces perceived speed and improves speed discrimination. J Neurophysiol 95: 255–270, 2006. doi:10.1152/jn.00750.2005.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson J, Harrison SJ. Spatial specificity and inheritance of adaptation in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 114: 1211–1226, 2015. doi:10.1152/jn.00167.2015.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson J, Heeger DJ. Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex. J Neurosci 26: 13128–13142, 2006. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1657-06.2006.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson J, Landy MS, Heeger DJ. Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 95: 862–881, 2006. doi:10.1152/jn.00668.2005.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson J, Smith AT. fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? Cereb Cortex 22: 567–576, 2012. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr119.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner Y, Honey CJ, Silbert LJ, Hasson U. Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. J Neurosci 31: 2906–2915, 2011. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-10.2011.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Lindquist MA, Meng Loh J, Atlas LY, Wager TD. Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. Neuroimage 45, Suppl: S187–S198, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.065.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Logothetis NK. The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J Neurosci 23: 3963–3971, 2003. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-03963.2003.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412: 150–157, 2001. doi:10.1038/35084005.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Montaser-Kouhsari L, Landy MS, Heeger DJ, Larsson J. Orientation-selective adaptation to illusory contours in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 27: 2186–2195, 2007. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4173-06.2007.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Müller JR, Metha AB, Krauskopf J, Lennie P. Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science 285: 1405–1408, 1999. doi:10.1126/science.285.5432.1405.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Murray SO, Olman CA, Kersten D. Spatially specific FMRI repetition effects in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 95: 2439–2445, 2006. doi:10.1152/jn.01236.2005.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Murray SO, Wojciulik E. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci 7: 70–74, 2004. doi:10.1038/nn1161.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Ollinger JM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI I. The Method. Neuroimage 13: 210–217, 2001. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0710.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Patterson CA, Duijnhouwer J, Wissig SC, Krekelberg B, Kohn A. Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions. J Neurophysiol 111: 1203–1213, 2014. doi:10.1152/jn.00030.2013.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437–442, 1997. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ray S, Ni AM, Maunsell JH. Strength of gamma rhythm depends on normalization. PLoS Biol 11: e1001477, 2013. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001477.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Savitzky A, Golay MJ. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36: 1627–1639, 1964. doi:10.1021/ac60214a047.
    CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar
  • Sayres R, Grill-Spector K. Object-selective cortex exhibits performance-independent repetition suppression. J Neurophysiol 95: 995–1007, 2006. doi:10.1152/jn.00500.2005.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Seeliger K, Fritsche M, Güçlü U, Schoenmakers S, Schoffelen JM, Bosch SE, van Gerven MAJ. Convolutional neural network-based encoding and decoding of visual object recognition in space and time. Neuroimage 180: 253–266, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.018.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Sereno MI, Dale AM, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Tootell RB. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268: 889–893, 1995. doi:10.1126/science.7754376.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1193–1216, 2001. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23, Suppl 1: S208–S219, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Soon CS, Venkatraman V, Chee MWL. Stimulus repetition and hemodynamic response refractoriness in event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 20: 1–12, 2003. doi:10.1002/hbm.10122.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Stigliani A, Weiner KS, Grill-Spector K. Temporal processing capacity in high-level visual cortex is domain specific. J Neurosci 35: 12412–12424, 2015. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-14.2015.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Tootell RB, Hadjikhani NK, Vanduffel W, Liu AK, Mendola JD, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 811–817, 1998. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.811.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • van Turennout M, Bielamowicz L, Martin A. Modulation of neural activity during object naming: effects of time and practice. Cereb Cortex 13: 381–391, 2003. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.4.381.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • van Turennout M, Ellmore T, Martin A. Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system. Nat Neurosci 3: 1329–1334, 2000. doi:10.1038/81873.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat Neurosci 5: 491–499, 2002. doi:10.1038/nn839.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Wandell BA, Dumoulin SO, Brewer AA. Visual field maps in human cortex. Neuron 56: 366–383, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Weigelt S, Limbach K, Singer W, Kohler A. Orientation-selective functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation in primary visual cortex revisited. Hum Brain Mapp 33: 707–714, 2012. doi:10.1002/hbm.21244.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner KS, Sayres R, Vinberg J, Grill-Spector K. fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: regional differences across time scales. J Neurophysiol 103: 3349–3365, 2010. doi:10.1152/jn.01108.2009.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Westerberg JA, Cox MA, Dougherty K, Maier A. V1 microcircuit dynamics: altered signal propagation suggests intracortical origins for adaptation in response to visual repetition. J Neurophysiol 121: 1938–1952, 2019. doi:10.1152/jn.00113.2019.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Winawer J, Witthoft N. Identification of the ventral occipital visual field maps in the human brain. F1000 Res 6: 1526, 2017. doi:10.12688/f1000research.12364.1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wissig SC, Kohn A. The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 107: 3370–3384, 2012. doi:10.1152/jn.00739.2011.
    LinkISIGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang N, Zhu XH, Chen W. Investigating the source of BOLD nonlinearity in human visual cortex in response to paired visual stimuli. Neuroimage 43: 204–212, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.033.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J, Benson NC, Kay KN, Winawer J. Compressive temporal summation in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 38: 691–709, 2018. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1724-17.2017.
    CrossrefPubMedISIGoogle Scholar